http://www.collared-scholar.com/chose-w ... g-trainer/
I know that some of you out there are opposed to clicking links, so I would suggest you do a Google search for "the collared scholar," go to the website, and find the article.
The author outlines the popular methods for finding a trainer like certifications, flashy websites, demo dogs, and such and then explains why those aren't ideal.
The author even has advice against using titles as an indicator...http://www.collared-scholar.com wrote:It is absolutely possible (and quite common) to get certified online with NO experience whatsoever in the actual hands-on training of dogs. Take a 250 question multiple choice test and congratulations, you are certified. Or, for the more advanced, go to an online school and complete 20 hours of hands on work and TADA!! You’ve earned your certification.
After the evaluation of the popular methods, the author provides some techniques that make sound sense.http://www.collared-scholar.com wrote:But here’s the thing. A title is only a small piece of the puzzle. A title doesn’t tell you about methods. It can’t qualify a trainer’s competency with things like anxiety and aggression. And it can’t tell you if a trainer has good customer service skills and is kind and fair with dogs. Those things aren’t qualified in a trial.
The article ends with a message to trainers...http://www.collared-scholar.com wrote:When you are choosing a trainer, make sure you select someone with direct experience and a solid track record dealing with YOUR pain point. Don’t choose a sport dog trainer to fix your aggression unless that’s something they have extensive experience with. And don’t choose a behaviorist to help you get your dog prepped for competition unless they’ve spent a considerable amount of time working in that arena.
I am interested in your opinion after reading the article.http://www.collared-scholar.com wrote:You all have strengths. And I hate to break it to you, but you can’t help every single dog owner.


Facebook page.
