CaroleBoaz wrote:I have no problem with people owning the type of dog they want to own, be it Pekinese or Great Dane. People need to stop being so touchy about their mixed dogs. And I really am tired of people telling me I have a Malinois with stripes. I have only checked my dog back 60 years, but so far all his ancestors are all NHSB registered dogs. Most people don't know that their DS are actually mixed, and I feel that is dishonest of the breeders. In Europe it seems the dogs are clearly called mixes and everybody knows it, anyway.
I have been checking many dogs' pedigrees to look for American breeding stock. I have run across very few purebred short-hair DS.
Ahh... The pure bred discussion.
For the readers who don't know: NHSB stands for Nederlands Honden StamBoek, and is the Dutch FCI (federaction cynologique Internationale) partner, with FCI being a pedigree registry like AKC.
May I inform you that the mere fact that a dog has a NHSB pedigree also doesn't automatically qualify it as a 'pure bred' DS? Maybe your booz is 'pure'. I have not looked into his background, nor do I have any desire. But I dare to state that any dog that has vdVastenow in it's lineage, could possibly be suspected of some outside influence that was snuck into that (NHSB) gene puddle. Many NHSB pedigrees still carry that kennel name. Good thing for the DS, BTW. With their alarminglly low numbers, they would be in a world of trouble if they had not been exposed to some KNPV dogs.
It's okay to prefer your brindles for decoration only, that truly is everyone's privilege. But if your only education took place by talking to some NHSB DS breeders, you may have missed the part where there has been a lot of back and forth between KNPV dogs and FCI stock since the stud books in Holland closed, I believe in 1975. Before that, they were basically the same, where dogs that fit the profile could be entered into the books. The practice of false pedigrees does not make it all right to cheat. But it makes it hard to make accurate statements about 'pure' Dutch Shepherds, especially short haired ones. Maybe broaden your horizon, by realizing that a breed is not only something on paper, but also a specimen that meets the requirements, in both looks and temperament, that a breed standard describes.
I am sure that my dogs are included in your disapproval. After all, some of the ancestors of the dog that won on Saturday come from my kennel. (Melissa McCord bred Touche out of Coa, who was bred by me) And I feel confident that you also disapprove of the fact that some countries in Europe, have open stud books, where a dog that fits the breed standard (yes, my Nico was seen by a breed judge in Holland) can be entered as a 'register dog' and its correct offspring can be allowed to stay in the gene pool. Shame on those who are honest about their dogs! Best hush, sneak it in under false names and boast the illusive pure bred status.
But I suspect that you have no intention of sharing the limelight with the "mixes", even though the decoratives won on both Friday and Sunday. And I am sorry that you feel that way.