Schlussdibusti wrote:That leads me to another question... How "tough" needs a police dog be? If it is too "flammable", it probably can't be used as "crowd control" at big festivals or such. And how often are they really sent after a criminal to "take a bite". There are probably liablity concerns and such.
I always wondered. Hopefully we have some folks on this board who know.
Christie took the time to answer the handler education part. It differs, but it's not always great, nor always sad, who steps up for the position, and their personal motives differ greatly.
The how tough does a K9 need to be question can be answered along the same lines.
It depends on the department, as well as the handler. A dog that needs to work in bad neighborhood in Detroit should be a lot tougher than a dog in rural South Dakota. The first one should be able to hold up against a suspect who is high on PCP, feels and fears nothing and fights like a madman. The second one might have to track a demented old lady who wanders off from the nursing home, and get her home before the dangerous cold of nightfall. He'd best not bite the scared old lady when he finds her, fending him off.
In the ideal world, the ideal dog can do everything, but there are levels of adequacy. Dogs for smaller departments generally do better if they have a saner more social attitude as a starting point. Same as their handlers, really. A big city cop is mostly exposed to different dangers, rules and mindsets than small town collegue. Their training should allow them to function in either environment. Their general attitude, though, will change with the circumstances they are constantly exposed to.
Of course, I assume that you are referring to dual purpose K9's with your 'how tough' question, since straight drug dogs, in theory, often only have to find drugs.